Incentive Travel Highlights Index

Incentive Travel Highlights Index

Incentive Travel Highlights Index

INCENTIVE TRAVEL INDEX

2023 Survey Highlights

In association with

October 2023

2

Incentive Travel Index

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Executive Summary

Introduction

Evolving Purpose of Incentive Travel

Growth, Budgets, and Spending

Challenges and Channel Dynamics

Destination Selection

Shifts in Program Design

Appendix

3

Incentive Travel Index

This is the fifth year of the collaboration between IRF and the SITE

Foundation on the Incentive Travel Index, formerly the Incentive Travel

Industry Index. With research partner Oxford Economics, the organizations

have again created an indispensable annual report on the state of incentive

travel, providing data on current and future evolution.

The 2023 online survey, fielded globally from May to July 2023, was

customized for five distinct incentive travel professional roles:

• Corporate end user

• Destination management company (DMC)

• Destination marketing organization (DMO)

• Destination supplier

• Third-party agency (incentive travel agency)

Nearly 2,500 incentive travel industry professionals, representing 19 industry

verticals, and 83 countries, participated in the survey.

For the latest on the Incentive Travel Index, see incentiveindex.com.

Foreword Sponsors

http://incentiveindex.com

Executive Summary1

5

Incentive travel is becoming a necessary part of company

culture due to its numerous benefits. Its purpose is

growing in importance and evolving over time.

The most important benefits of incentive travel are changing. Western Europe, North America, and Rest of

World are shifting to soft power benefits, while Asia-Pacific (APAC) respondents are seeing hard power as

becoming more important.

79%

83%

90%

Bring together a dispersed workforce

Valued as a reward

Retaining talent

Primary reasons behind incentive travel’s strategic importance

(Share of respondents who agree)

67%

60%

50%

30%

55%

64% 63%

74%

APAC Rest of World North America Western Europe

Hard power benefits Soft power benefits

Primary future benefits reported by region

(Share of buyers selecting more important)

Many end-user companies have senior leadership that view incentive travel

as ‘need to have’ (53%) and are ‘highly engaged’ in planning (37%).

Trim, 13%

Nice but not essential,

19%

Necessary evil, 21%

Strategic differentiator,

48%

Need to have, 53%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Less necessary More necessary

(Share of end-users, multiple answers allowed) (Share of end-users, multiple answers allowed)

6

Average share of program budget allocation in 2024 (Share of buyers reporting levels above or significantly above 2022 levels)

Many expect incentive travel activity

and spend per person to rise above

2022 levels in coming years. Rising

costs will help boost spend per

person.

(Share of buyers reporting levels above or significantly above 2022 levels)

By region:

22%

21%

27%

27%

26%

25%

19%

20%

16%

15%

19%

20%

12%

14%

13%

12%

8%

9%

8%

8%

11%

10%

9%

7%

4%

7%

5%

5%

Rest of World

APAC

Western Europe

North America

46%

57% 59%

43%

59% 64%

This year Next year Two years out

Activity Spend per person

25%

22%

18%

13%

9%

8% 5%

Hotel

Airfare

Food and beverage

Activities

Third party agency fees

Ground transportation

Other (e.g., AV)

7

The recent operating environment has tested even the strongest relationships, with planning uncertainty and

limitations such as airlift and resort availability. Survey results confirmed this situation, as among buyers and

sellers, many indicated relationships are challenging, difficult, uncertain or weakened, even as some of their

colleagues referred to relationships as strong, stable or efficient.

(Share of aggregated responses)

(Share of respondents)

Costs are becoming increasingly important as inflation is

a major future challenge across all industries and regions.

41%

33%

25%

Challenging Difficult

Uncertain Weakened

Strong Stable

Efficient

Complex

Agree that current DMC pricing models

are outdated and should be fee-based

Say that that the presence of a good

DMC is increasing in importance

Say that assistance with venues and DMCs

is the most useful support from DMOs

Say that destination expertise is the

most useful support from DMOs

8

Across regions, buyers expect to increase incentive

travel to destinations that are within closer proximity,

while considering destinations not used before.

While decreasing distance of travel and increasing resort

use, buyers are still looking for new destinations they

haven’t used before

7%

9%

2%

1%

7%

3%

8%

2%

3%

5%

12%

5%

27%

16%

27%

34%

21%

22%

13%

17%

33%

31%

36%

34%

53%

53%

55%

52%

55%

59%

33%

45%

58%

37%

37%

44%

Gulf States

Mexico

Emerging Europe

Oceania

Northeast Asia

Southeast Asia

South America

Emerging Europe

Western Europe

Western Europe

Mexico

Caribbean

R e

s t

o f

W o

rl d

A P

A C

W e

s te

rn E

u ro

p e

N o

rt h

A m

e ri

c a

Less than in 2022 Same amount as in 2022 More than in 2022

Percentage of respondents planning to use each destination

(Share of buyers for top three increase usage areas)

9

The future of incentive travel sees program

characteristics and considerations changing and

differing by region.

44%

40%

25%

27%

25%

22%

34%

21%

31%

37%

41%

52%

Entire company trips based on performance

Shorter programs

Periodic events to convene dispersed workforce

Programs with more on-site meals and activities

Disagree Unsure Agree

(Share of buyers)

Buyers are seeing an increase in the importance of safety

from crime/threat as well as cost across regions.

Introduction2

11

Incentive Travel Index

Buyers

Sellers

• Incentive travel end-users

• Incentive travel agencies

• Destination management companies (DMCs)

• Suppliers (hotels, cruise lines, venues)

• Destination marketing organizations (DMOs)

2,464 total survey respondents

1,648 complete survey responses

933 buyers across 19 industries

83 countries represented by survey respondents

• Incentive travel corporate program owner (e.g., end-user) • Incentive travel agency (e.g., incentive house, third party planner, independent

planner or other intermediary) • Destination management company (e.g., DMC coordinating local on-site

implementation) • Supplier to the incentive market (e.g., hotels, cruise lines, venues,

transportation companies, AV companies, décor companies) • Destination marketing organizations (e.g., DMO or convention & visitors

bureau)

Terms

May to July 2023 online survey period

A global survey to understand incentive travel

12

Incentive Travel Index

The survey reflects incentive travel buyers and sellers

Incentive travel comes to life through an extensive,

collaborative network. The ITI is based on a balanced

view of seller (62%) and buyers (38%).

Buyers include:

• Incentive travel house organizing events on behalf of

client organizations

• Incentive travel program owner sponsoring events on

behalf of their organization

Sellers include:

• Suppliers to the incentive travel market (e.g., hotels,

cruise lines, venues, transportation companies)

• Destination management companies (e.g., DMC

coordinating local on-site implementation)

• Destination marketing organization (e.g., DMO,

convention and visitors bureau, national tourism

office)

A balanced, 360-degree view of incentive travel Respondent roles

(Share of respondents by role)

I1. Please select the role that best describes your involvement in incentive travel Response base: n = 2,464 respondents

Incentive Travel House,

27%

Suppliers to the Incentive Market, 22%

Destination Management

Companies, 25%

Incentive Travel Program Owner, 14%

DMOs, 11%

Other, 5%

13

Incentive Travel Index

Balanced respondent base provides global perspective

In total, 52% of respondents are based in North

America. The share of respondents from Western

Europe is 16%, with 15% from APAC. The Rest of the

World made up the reminder of respondents (18%).

Global response base with strong

representation of North America

Location

(Share of respondents)

M1. Where is the organization for which you work based? Response base: n = 1,646 respondents

14

Incentive Travel Index

Finance, insurance and tech top the industries served

Finance and insurance is the most important industry

(rank 1) for 26% of buyers and 48% of buyers rank the

industry in their top three client sectors.

Finance and insurance is a primary industry

for incentive travel programs

Customer industries

(Share of buyers indicating a top three rank)

M5. For which of the following industry(ies) does your team primarily organize incentive travel programs? Rank 1 is most important; label is % of all buyers choosing sector in top three Response base (Buyers): n = 504 respondents

2%

3%

3%

3%

4%

4%

4%

4%

5%

6%

8%

8%

9%

18%

22%

24%

29%

38%

48%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%

Media and entertainment

Automotive parts and service

Energy, engineering, and electrical services

Luxury goods

Education

Logistics, including transportation

Retail

Other

Fast-moving consumer goods

Agriculture

Construction

Professional services

Hospitality

Direct selling to consumers

Automotive sales and distribution

Manufacturing

Pharmaceuticals and health care

Technology

Finance and insurance

Rank 1

Rank 2

Rank 3

Evolving Purpose of Incentive Travel3

16

Incentive Travel Index

Hard power benefits are the main reason for incentive travel

Hard power benefits, such as increased sales and

market share, are the most cited reason for using

incentive travel (36%).

Many buyers cite that all benefits are important (30%),

while 24% cite that primarily soft power benefits are

the reason for using incentive travel.

Many buyers currently use incentive travel

for its hard power benefits

Reasons for using incentive travel

(Share of buyers)

G7. Why does your organization/clients use an incentive travel program? Response base (buyers): n = 600 respondents

4%

7%

24%

30%

36%

For our organization/clients, there are other reasons

Primarily for 'knowledge transfer benefits', such as training and brand

compliance

Primarily for 'soft power benefits', such as focus on company culture, engagement and relationships

'Hard power', 'soft power' and 'knowledge transfer' are all important

Primarily for 'hard power benefits', such as financial ROI, increased sales

and market share

17

Incentive Travel Index

North American buyers more focused on hard power benefits

Hard power benefits are the most important reason

for using incentive travel in North America (42%) and

Western Europe (35%). In Asia Pacific, 31% of buyers

report hard power benefit are the primary reason for

using incentive travel.

For the rest of the world, hard power and soft power

benefits share importance.

Buyers in North America and Western Europe

are particularly focused on hard power benefits

Primary reason for using incentive travel by region

(Share of buyers)

G7. Why does your organization/clients use an incentive travel program? Response base (buyers): n = 600 respondents

42%

35%

31%

26%

22%

26%

13%

26%

North America Western Europe Asia Pacific Rest of World

Primarily hard power benefits

Primarily soft power benefits

18

Incentive Travel Index

The importance of soft power benefits is growing

While hard power benefits, such as increased sales,

remain key, nearly three-in-five of buyers report they

are shifting future programs toward a greater focus

on soft power benefits, such as company culture and

engagement.

Buyers are shifting future program focus

towards soft power benefits

Changing benefits reported by buyers

(Share of buyers)

P1. In your future programs, how are the most important benefits changing? Response base (buyers): n = 593 respondents

12%

4%

7%

44%

44%

32%

38%

49%

58%

Knowledge transfer benefits, such as training and brand compliance

Hard power benefits, such as financial ROI, increased sales and market share

Soft power benefits, such as focus on company culture, engagement and

relationships

Less important About the same More important

19

Incentive Travel Index

Shift in primary benefit of incentive travel differs by region

For Western Europe (74%), North America (63%), and

Rest of World (64%), soft power benefits is cited the

most by buyers as a benefit that is becoming more

important.

Hard power is the most cited benefit that is becoming

more important in APAC (67%).

Western Europe, North America, and Rest of

World are shifting to soft power benefits, while

APAC respondents are seeing hard power as

becoming more important

Primary future benefits reported by region

(Share of buyers indicating each type of benefit is becoming more important)

P1. In your future programs, how are the most important benefits changing? Response base (buyers): n = 593 respondents

67%

60%

50%

30%

55%

64% 63%

74%

APAC Rest of World North America Western Europe

Hard power benefits Soft power benefits

20

Incentive Travel Index

Perceptions on incentive travel are shifting

Many company executives (68%) agree that incentive

travel is a key part of future workforce strategy.

The social prestige of incentive travel has become

more important according to 66% of respondents.

Two-thirds agree that incentive travel is now

mostly about soft power

Future of incentive travel

(Share of respondents that agree)

S7. What is the future of incentive travel?

Response base: n = 1,747 respondents

68% Agree that incentive travel was previously used primarily to motivate

individual performance (“hard dollars”), but now it’s mostly about

company culture, relationships, and overall performance (“soft power”).

68% Agree that company executives increasingly recognize that incentive travel

is a key part of future workforce strategy.

66% Agree that the social prestige of incentive travel has

become even more important.

21

Incentive Travel Index

Incentive travel for performance motivation remains key

While soft power benefits have increased in

importance, 76% agree that incentive travel will

always come back to its roots motivating individual

performance.

Incentive travel has many other roles. Most agree that

with a dispersed workforce, incentive travel has an

even more important role building engagement and

company culture (81%).

.

Many agree that soft power benefits can be

great, but incentive travel will always come back

to its roots motivating individual performance

Soft power benefits of incentive travel

(Share of respondents)

S4. Do you agree with the following statements? Response base: n = 1,784 respondents

5%

6%

19%

13%

76%

81%

Soft power' benefits can be great, but incentive travel will always come back to

its roots motivating individual performance

With a dispersed workforce, incentive travel has an even more important role

building engagement and company culture

Disagree Unsure Agree

22

Incentive Travel Index

Helps retain talent and engage dispersed workforce

Retention of employees (90%) is the most commonly-

cited reason why incentive travel is gaining strategic

importance, followed by “travel is becoming more

valued as a reward” (83%). Also, incentive travel is

strategically important as it fulfills the need to bring

together a more dispersed workforce (79%).

Organizations are striving to retain talent

and rebuild relationships with the help of

incentive travel

Drivers of incentive travel strategic importance

(Share of respondents who agree)

S6. Why is incentive travel gaining strategic importance? Respondents who answered that incentive travel is gaining strategic importance in question S4. Each respondent asked to select the most important factors (up to two). Response base: n = 1,256 respondents

Yellow highlight represents category that involves retaining and engaging talent

72%

76%

79%

83%

90%

Competitive advantage in the hiring process

It is essential to achieving desired business results

Need to bring together a more dispersed workforce (e.g., work from home)

Travel is becoming more valued as a reward

Greater importance of retaining talented employees

23

Incentive Travel Index

Incentive travel is gaining strategic importance

Incentive travel is also agreed to be helping meeting

professionals have a more important ‘seat at the

table’ (66%).

.

Three-quarters agree that incentive travel is

gaining strategic importance

Strategic future of incentive travel

(Share of respondents)

S4. Do you agree with the following statements? Response base: n = 1,784 respondents

7%

6%

27%

20%

66%

74%

Meeting professionals today have a more important 'seat at the table'

Incentive travel is gaining strategic importance

Disagree Unsure Agree

24

Incentive Travel Index

Senior leadership view incentive travel as a must have

Among end users, 53% report senior leadership view

incentive travel as a ‘need to have’ – such as essential

in driving profits. Incentive travel is also viewed as an

essential strategic differentiator among 48% of

respondents.

The majority of senior leadership in end-user

companies view incentive travel as ‘need to

have’ from the perspective of driving profits

Senior management view on incentive travel

(Share of end-users)

S1. How does senior leadership view incentive travel? (excluding ‘not sure’) Response base (end-users): n = 186 respondents (multiple responses allowed)

Area to trim and cut, 13%

Nice to have but not essential, 19%

Necessary evil (too scared to cut), 21%

Essential, strategic differentiator/source of competitive advantage,

48%

Need to have (e.g., essential to drive

profits), 53%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Less necessary More necessary

25

Incentive Travel Index

Senior leadership remain keen on hard and soft power benefits

In terms of approach to incentive travel, senior

managers are highly engaged (37%). While 36% of

respondents say senior leadership is primarily

focused on maximizing ROI (hard power), 35% seek

more cultural and engagement benefits (soft power).

Senior managers are highly engaged on

incentive travel programs with many primarily

focused on maximizing ROI

Senior management approach to incentive travel

(Share of end-users)

S2. How is senior leadership approaching incentive travel planning? Response base (end-users): n = 184 respondents (multiple responses allowed)

16%

17%

18%

22%

35%

36%

37%

Disinterested, leave it on autopilot

An area where they are willing to take risks

Discussing ways to consolidate or reduce incentive travel

Play it safe, don't change it

Seeking to have incentive travel do more for organization culture and engagement

Primarily focused on maximizing the ROI of incentive programs

Highly engaged

Growth, Budgets, and Spending4

27

Incentive Travel Index

Incentive travel activity anticipated to display strong growth

In the 2022 survey, many respondents reported

incentive travel activity was above pre-pandemic

levels. The industry is expected to expand further,

with many respondents expecting incentive travel

activity above 2022 levels in 2023, with the share

growing in 2024 and 2025.

Optimism is strongest among suppliers, followed by

DMCs.

Solid growth anticipated in incentive travel

activity

Expectations of incentive travel activity by role

(Share of respondents reporting number of people above or significantly above 2022 or 2019 levels)

G1. Level of incentive travel activity compared to 2022, in terms of the number of people (qualifiers, guests and other participants)? Response base: n = 1,953 respondents

Note: 2023 survey is relative to 2022 activity , while 2022 survey is relative to 2019 activity

DMC Supplier

DMO End user / incentive house

32%

49%

63%

38%

55% 54%

This year Next year Two years out

38%

56%

68%

49%

66%

73%

This year Next year Two years out

31%

48%

61%

46%

57% 59%

This year Next year Two years out

27%

44%

56%56%

65% 70%

This year Next year Two years out

2022 Survey 2023 Survey

28

Incentive Travel Index

Pharma/health care expects greatest increase in activity

By 2024 (next year) the majority of buyers (more than

50%) expect an increase in incentive travel activity

compared to 2022. The increase is led by the

pharmaceuticals and health care sector.

The pharmaceuticals and health care sector

expects the largest increase by 2024

Expectations of incentive travel activity for buyers by industry

(Share of buyers reporting activity above or significantly above 2022 levels)

G1a. Level of incentive travel activity compared to 2022, in terms of the number of people (qualifiers, guests and other participants)? Response base (buyers): n = 708 respondents

47%

46%

48%

42%

52%

48%

51%

54%

41%

59%

55%

61%

61%

71%

51%

53%

56%

58%

62%

65%

72%

Manufacturing

Direct selling to consumers

Finance and insurance

All other sectors

Automotive

Technology

Pharmaceuticals and health care

Two years out

Next year

This year

29

Incentive Travel Index

APAC expects greatest increase in activity

The largest expectation of Incentive travel activity

increasing above 2022 levels is displayed in the APAC

region with 77% of respondents reporting activity

above or significantly above 2022 levels by 2025.

APAC expects the largest increase by 2024 Expectations of incentive travel activity for buyers by region

(Share of buyers reporting activity above or significantly above 2022 levels)

G1a. Level of incentive travel activity compared to 2022, in terms of the number of people (qualifiers, guests and other participants)? Response base (buyers): n = 708 respondents

37%

48%

46%

61%

45%

58%

61%

74%

50%

58%

59%

77%

Western Europe

North America

Rest of World

APAC

Two years out

Next year

This year

30

Incentive Travel Index

Spend per person is also expected to increase

Most respondents (76%) believe rising costs is the

most important future challenge facing incentive

travel professionals. Higher costs add to expectations

of higher spending per person. Higher spend per

person as well as activity will result in greater

spending within the industry.

Rising costs will help boost spend per person Expectations of spend per person by role

(Share of respondents reporting spend per person and number of people expectations above or significantly above 2022 levels)

G2. Level of spending per person compared to 2022? Response base: n = 1,912 respondents

DMC Supplier

DMO End user / incentive house

56%

65% 70%

43%

58% 61%

This year Next year Two years out

Activity

Spend per person

38%

55% 54%

46% 51%

58%

This year Next year Two years out

49%

66%

73%

49%

66%

73%

This year Next year Two years out

46%

57% 59%

43%

59% 64%

This year Next year Two years out

31

Incentive Travel Index

Manufacturing spend per person growth strong

Despite relatively weaker activity growth over the next

two years, manufacturing spend per person is

expected to grow quickly.

Spending per person is anticipated to grow

strongly over the next two years for each

industry

Expectations of incentive spend per person for buyers by industry

(Share of buyers reporting spend per person are above or significantly above 2022 levels)

G2. Level of spending per person compared to 2022? Response base (buyers): n = 704 respondents

42%

46%

41%

40%

48%

37%

47%

56%

59%

68%

73%

62%

46%

60%

64%

61%

74%

73%

69%

50%

58%

All other sectors

Technology

Pharmaceuticals and health care

Manufacturing

Finance and insurance

Direct selling to consumers

Automotive Two years out

Next year

This year

32

Incentive Travel Index

Hotel and airfare account for the majority of program budget

The largest expense expected in 2024 for incentive

travel programs is on hotels, which should represent

25% of total budget allocation. Airfare will comprise

22%, followed by food and beverage spending (18%),

and activities (13%).

Program budgets for 2024 comprise of

spending on numerous categories

Average program budget allocation in 2024

(Spending category share of total budget allocation)

G4. What is the average program budget allocation of programs next year (2024)? Response base (buyers): n = 645 respondents

25% Share of budget spent on hotel accommodation

25%

22%

18%

13%

9%

8%

5%

Hotel

Airfare

Food and beverage

Activities

Third party agency fees

Ground transportation

Other (e.g., AV)

33

Incentive Travel Index

Hotel plus airfare share highest for Rest of World buyers

While buyers in North America and Western Europe

see highest budget allocation in hotels, APAC and

Rest of World witness greatest allocation in airfare

costs.

Spending share on hotels is highest in North America

and Western Europe at 27% of total 2024 budget,

while spending share on airfare is highest for Rest of

World at 26%, followed by APAC at 25%.

For these top two spending categories, Rest of World

respondents see the largest contribution among

regions (48%).

Budget allocation slightly differs by region Average program budget allocation in 2024 by region

(Spending category share of total budget allocation)

G4. What is the average program budget allocation of programs next year (2024)? Response base (buyers): n = 645 respondents

22%

21%

27%

27%

26%

25%

19%

20%

16%

15%

19%

20%

12%

14%

13%

12%

8%

9%

8%

8%

11%

10%

9%

7%

4%

7%

5%

5%

Rest of World

APAC

Western Europe

North America

Hotel Airfare Food and beverage Activities Third party agency fees Ground transportation Other (e.g., AV)

34

Incentive Travel Index

Food and beverage spending to see biggest increase by 2025

Among key budget drivers, most buyers (65%) expect

spending on food and beverage to increase by 2025.

Following F&B in the share of buyers who see either

an increase or large increase are the traditional key

spending areas of air and hotel, and then activities.

Increases expected in key budget drivers Changes in key budget drivers

(Share of buyers who see an increase or large increase)

G5.How will key budget drivers change in future years? Response base (buyers): n = 627 respondents

14%

24%

27%

30%

37%

35%

47%

43%

55%

63%

64%

60%

20%

29%

34%

35%

38%

39%

47%

50%

55%

64%

64%

65%

Program length

Program marketing and communications

Program admin

Gifting

Production

Talent, decor and entertainment

Ground transportation

Number of attendees

Destination experiences and activities

Hotel

Air

F&B

Two years out (2025)

Next year (2024)

Challenges and Channel Dynamics5

36

Incentive Travel Index

Inflation and talent attraction/retention challenges loom

Inflation is a widespread future challenge, cited by

76% of respondents – down from 80% in 2022.

Other widespread future challenges include attracting

and retaining talent (55%), uncertainty regarding

short-term planning (49%), and loss of industry

knowledge due to staff departures (47%).

The shares citing challenges have fallen but

these challenges remain

Future challenges facing incentive travel professionals

(Share of respondents)

S3. What important future challenges face incentive travel professionals? Response base: n = 1,801 respondents (multiple responses allowed)

2%

11%

39%

18%

35%

22%

53%

47%

62%

63%

66%

80%

2%

23%

26%

28%

29%

32%

34%

35%

37%

38%

38%

47%

49%

55%

76%

None of these choices

Climate change

Public health

Increased focus on diversity, inclusion, etc.

Need for program justification

Evolving preferences among qualifiers

Securing resort availability

Increased focus on sustainability

Securing airlift availability

International instability

Legal aspects with increased focus on contracts

Loss of industry knowledge due to staff departures

Uncertainty, short-term planning

Attracting and retaining talent

Rising costs / inflation

2023 Survey

2022 Survey

37

Incentive Travel Index

Inflation is the top challenge for all regions

The primary future challenge facing incentive travel

professionals in each region is rising costs/inflation.

The largest share of respondents citing inflation

challenges are in Rest of World (85%).

After inflation, the challenge of attracting and

retaining talent is also important. APAC and Western

Europe have 62% of their respondents stating that

talent retention is an important future challenge.

All regions face challenges pertaining to

inflation and talent retention

Future challenges facing incentive travel professionals by region

(Share of respondents)

S3. What important future challenges face incentive travel professionals? Response base: n = 1,646 respondents (multiple responses allowed)

85% 79% 77%

72%

52%

62% 57%

62%

Rest of World Western Europe North America APAC

Rising costs / inflation Attracting and retaining talent

38

Incentive Travel Index

Inflation is also the top challenge across industries

The primary future challenge facing incentive travel

professionals in each industry is rising costs/inflation.

Multiple future challenges face each industry Future challenges facing incentive travel professionals by industry

(Share of respondents greater than 70%)

S3. What important future challenges face incentive travel professionals? Response base: n = 505 respondents

Pharmaceuticals & health care (96%)

Technology (94%)

Automotive (89%)

Finance & insurance (82%)

Manufacturing (81%)

Rising costs / inflation

Attracting and retaining talent

Automotive (78%)

Pharmaceuticals & health care (71%)

Securing airlift availability

Pharmaceuticals & health care (71%)

39

Incentive Travel Index

Delivering incentive travel is now more challenging

Planning and delivering incentive travel

experiences has become more challenging

Status of the incentive travel business

(Share of buyers that agree)

S8. How is the ‘business of incentive travel’? Response base (buyers): n = 531 respondents

Challenges also exist on the business side of

incentive travel. Planning and delivering incentive

travel experiences has become more challenging for

75% of buyers.

The majority of buyers (85%) agree that higher costs

and reduced airlift/hotel availability are making it

more difficult to satisfy senior leadership/decision

makers.

Many (84%) also agree that the capabilities of

experienced incentive travel organizers have never

been more valuable.

84% Agree that the capabilities of experienced incentive travel organizers have

never been more valuable.

85% Agree that higher costs and reduced airlift/hotel availability is making it

more difficult to satisfy senior leadership/decision makers.

75% Agree that planning and delivering incentive travel experiences has

become more challenging

40

Incentive Travel Index

DMO support is valuable

Buyers rely on DMOs for numerous aspects of

incentive travel

Support from DMOs

(Share of buyers)

D4. What has been the most useful support you receive from DMOs? (excluding ‘other’ and ‘not applicable’) Response base (buyers): n = 554 respondents (multiple responses allowed)

Destination expertise and background is most cited

as the most useful support received from DMOs

(51%), followed by assistance with venues (48%), and

sponsored site visits (46%).

7%

12%

16%

21%

23%

46%

48%

51%

Virtual tours

Specialized collateral

In-person representation at trade shows

Assistance with hotels

Dedicated resource deployed on incentive travel

Sponsored site visits

Assistance with venues, DMCs and other providers

Destination expertise and background

41

Incentive Travel Index

Relationship between buyers and sellers are strained

Most (54%) view the relationship between buyers

and suppliers as complex

Relationship between buyers and suppliers

(Share of respondents)

S9. Relationships between incentive travel buyers and suppliers are currently? Response base: n = 1,760 respondents

The recent operating environment has tested even the

strongest relationships, with planning uncertainty and

limitations such as airlift and resort availability.

Survey results confirmed this situation, as among

buyers and sellers, many indicated relationships are

challenging, difficult, uncertain or weakened, even as

some of their colleagues referred to relationships as

strong, stable or efficient.

Difficult, 19%

Weakened, 13%

Complex, 54%

Challenging due to slow supplier

response, 38%

Uncertain, 16%

Not sure, 3%

Stable, 21%

Efficient, 17%

Strong, 32%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Bad Good

Aggregated responses to Question S9

41%

33%

25%

Challenging Difficult

Uncertain Weakened

Strong Stable

Efficient

Complex

42

Incentive Travel Index

All industries report challenging or complex relationships

Relationships are mostly complex or challenging

for various industries

Top description of relationship between buyers and suppliers by industry

(Share of respondents)

S9. Relationships between incentive travel buyers and suppliers are currently? Response base: n = 505 respondents

All industries report either challenging or complex

relationships between buyers and suppliers.

71%

66% 65% 63%

46%

35% 32%

66%

59% 58%

63%

56%

62%

51%

Manufacturing Technology Automotive Finance and insurance

Pharmaceuticals and health care

Direct selling to consumers

All other sectors

Challenging due to slow supplier response Complex

43

Incentive Travel Index

Having a good DMC is important to buyers of incentive travel

Half of all buyers view the presence of a good

DMC as increasing in importance

DMC considerations

(Share of buyers)

D3d. Do you see program considerations changing? Response base (buyers): n = 546 respondents

The presence of a good DMC is increasing in

importance among half of all buyers, and 42% of

respondents agree that current DMC pricing models

are outdated and should be fee-based.

S5. Do you agree with the following statements about the future of incentive travel? Response base (All): n = 1,769 respondents

50% Say that that the presence of a good DMC is increasing in importance

42% Agree that current DMC pricing models are outdated and should be

fee-based

Destination Selection6

45

Incentive Travel Index

Buyers actively seek new destinations not used before

Buyers are increasingly looking for something new

and seeking destinations they haven’t used before

(71%). Resorts – both all-inclusive and regular – have

gained popularity, while high-profile destinations

should also see increased use.

Interest is increasing for shorter distance trips (41%),

while urban locations see more decreasing use than

increasing use.

More buyers are looking for new destinations

they haven’t used before

Changing destination types

(Share of buyers)

D3a. Do you see destination types changing? Response base (buyers): n = 555 respondents

24%

20%

22%

13%

9%

6%

11%

6%

55%

46%

44%

46%

48%

48%

35%

22%

21%

34%

34%

41%

43%

46%

53%

71%

Urban

Greater distance from participant origin

Cruise ship

Shorter distance from participant origin

High profile / long-established

Resort

All-inclusive resort

New destinations not used before

Decreasing Use No change Increasing use

46

Incentive Travel Index

Many buyers tend to look closer to home

Large shares of North American, Western Europe, and

APAC buyers plan to increase their use of

destinations that are within closer proximity.

Across regions, buyers expect to increase

incentive travel to destinations that are

within closer proximity

Destination use planned by buyers across regions

(Share of buyers by region for top three increase usage areas)

D1. How do you expect your planned use of the following destinations for incentive travel will change as you plan future events relative to 2022? Respondents “not using” a destination excluded from chart Response base (buyers): n = using: 538 respondents 7%

9%

2%

1%

7%

3%

8%

2%

3%

5%

12%

5%

27%

16%

27%

34%

21%

22%

13%

17%

33%

31%

36%

34%

53%

53%

55%

52%

55%

59%

33%

45%

58%

37%

37%

44%

Gulf States

Mexico

Emerging Europe

Oceania

Northeast Asia

Southeast Asia

South America

Emerging Europe

Western Europe

Western Europe

Mexico

Caribbean

R e

s t

o f

W o

rl d

A P

A C

W e

s te

rn E

u ro

p e

N o

rt h

A m

e ri

c a

Less than in 2022 Same amount as in 2022 More than in 2022 Percentage of respondents planning to use each destination

47

Incentive Travel Index

Many buyers are open to considering new destinations

For example, one-third of North American buyers say

they aren’t using Oceania for incentive programs, but

that they would be willing to consider.

Western Europe stand out as a region from which

buyers would be most willing to consider new

destinations.

Many North American buyers report they

aren’t using Oceania, Alaska and South Asia,

but that they are open to considering them

Destinations not used but under consideration by buyers

(Share of buyers by region for top three areas under consideration)

D1. How do you expect your planned use of the following destinations for incentive travel will change as you plan future events relative to 2022? Respondents “using” a destination excluded from chart Response base (Buyers): n = 538 respondents

26%

28%

32%

31%

32%

33%

44%

45%

50%

33%

34%

34%

26%

9%

20%

14%

13%

24%

31%

20%

15%

31%

20%

19%

Alaska

Hawaii

Other Africa

Central America

South America

Other Africa

Alaska

South Asia

Oceania

South Asia

Alaska

Oceania

R e

s t

o f

W o

rl d

A P

A C

W e

s te

rn E

u ro

p e

N o

rt h

A m

e ri

c a

Have not been using but willing to consider Have not been using and will not consider

Percentage of respondents not using but will consider each destination

48

Incentive Travel Index

Program success is based on sightseeing and connections

Relationship building (58%), group dining (57%) and

luxury/bucket list travel (53%) were also considered

important by most respondents. Relationship building,

however, was down from 72% of respondents in 2022.

Activities that promote relationship building is most

important to the manufacturing (78%), finance and

insurance (73%), and pharmaceuticals and health care

(73%) industries. Group cultural sightseeing activities

are relatively more important in Rest of World (69%),

while group dining experiences take greater

significance in Western Europe (66%).

Group cultural sightseeing experiences is the

most appreciated activity in an incentive

travel program

Activities key to a successful program

(Share of respondents)

P2. Which of the following program activities do you consider most important for a successful incentive travel program? Response base: n = 1,713 respondents

12%

25%

35%

35%

46%

48%

46%

42%

58%

57%

72%

66%

14%

25%

32%

35%

39%

41%

43%

43%

53%

57%

58%

60%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Shopping experiences

Meetings

Activities promoting wellness

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

Free time

Award celebrations

Multiple options aimed at smaller groups

Team-building activities

Luxury travel experiences/'bucket list'

Group dining experiences

Activities that promote relationship-building

Group cultural sightseeing experiences

2023 Survey

2022 Survey

Shifts in Program Design7

50

Incentive Travel Index

Many buyers see shift to on-site meals and activities

Buyers are witnessing changing program

characteristics. Many agree there is a shift toward

programs with more on-site meals and activities (52%

in 2023 compared to 37% in 2022), followed by a sift

towards events to convene a dispersed workforce

(41%).

More buyers disagree that they are seeing a shift

toward entire company trips based on performance

(44%), as well as shorter programs (40%), than those

who agree.

Buyers are seeing programs changing toward

more on-site meals and activities, as well as

events to convene a dispersed workforce

Changing program characteristics

(Share of buyers)

D3b. Do you see program characteristic changing? Response base (buyers): n = 549 respondents

44%

40%

25%

27%

25%

22%

34%

21%

31%

37%

41%

52%

Entire company tripsbased on company

performance/achievements

Shorter programs

Periodic/recurring company events to convene a dispersed workforce

Programs with more on-site meals and activities.

Disagree Unsure Agree

51

Incentive Travel Index

Increasing use of qualification-based incentives

Buyers see greater use of qualification-based

incentives. Motivational events that cross functions is

most popular with 47% of buyers expecting increased

use in 2023, compared to 39% in 2022.

Increasing use of sales incentives is less popular but

is up from 22% of all buyers in 2022 to 29% in 2023.

Buyers are seeing a shift in program focus

towards motivational events that cross

functions

Changing program focus

(Share of buyers)

D3c. Do you see shifts in program focus? Response base (buyers): n = 548 respondents

8%

8%

64%

45%

29%

47%

Traditional, qualification- based sales incentives

Qualification-based motivational events that

cross functions

Decreasing use No change Increasing use

52

Incentive Travel Index

Many view safety considerations are increasing in importance

The most commonly cited program consideration

that is increasing in importance is that the destination

is perceived as safe from a crime/threat perspective

(72% in 2023 compared to 76% in 2022). Cost

considerations are also prominent with 71% of buyers

expecting it to increase in importance.

The share of buyers citing health risks as increasing

in importance fell from 76% in 2022 to 58% in 2023.

The presence of a good DMC is increasing in

importance among half of all buyers surveyed.

Buyers are seeing an increase in the

importance of safety from crime/threat as well

as cost

Changing program considerations

(Share of buyers)

D3d. Do you see program considerations changing? Response base (buyers): n = 546 respondents

7%

10%

9%

6%

7%

10%

4%

3%

62%

49%

46%

44%

43%

32%

25%

25%

31%

41%

45%

50%

50%

58%

71%

72%

Presence of a good DMO

Lower carbon footprint

Strong diversity, equity, inclusion culture in destination

Presence of a good DMC

ESG

Perceived as safe from health perspective

Cost

Perceived as safe from a crime/threat perspective

Decreasing importance No change Increasing importance

53

Incentive Travel Index

Changing program considerations differ by region

Many regions see health, personal safety, and costs

as increasingly important program considerations.

Health, personal safety, and costs are

increasingly important considerations across

many regions

Changing program considerations by region

(Share of buyers)

D3d. Do you see program considerations changing? Response base (buyers): n = 546 respondents

8%

2%

6%

10%

1%

5%

5%

9%

2%

2%

31%

35%

28%

30%

23%

34%

38%

34%

33%

22%

22%

60%

63%

66%

60%

68%

72%

61%

62%

66%

58%

75%

76%

ESG

Cost

Perceived as safe from health perspective

Perceived as safe from health perspective

Perceived as safe from a crime/threat perspective

Cost

Perceived as safe from a crime/threat perspective

Cost

Perceived as safe from health perspective

Perceived as safe from health perspective

Cost

Perceived as safe from a crime/threat perspective

R e

s t

o f

W o

rl d

A P

A C

W e

s te

rn E

u ro

p e

N o

rt h

A m

e ri

c a

Decreasing importance No change Increasing importance

Percentage of respondents planning to use each destination

54

Incentive Travel Index

Incentive travel will evolve in the future

Most respondents (51%) agree that political

considerations will override other destination

considerations.

Many buyers agree that political

considerations will override other destination

considerations

Future of incentive travel

(Share of respondents)

S5. Do you agree with the following statements about the future of incentive travel? Response base: n = 1,769 respondents

24%

21%

16%

45%

37%

33%

31%

42%

51%

ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence will significantly disrupt

incentive travel marketing and communications

Individual travel incentives may be valued by attendees, but corporations

remain unlikely to offer them

Political considerations will override other destination considerations

Disagree Unsure Agree

Appendix8

56

Incentive Travel Index

Demographic detail (1 of 4) Respondent roles

(Share of respondents by role)

I1. Please select the role that best describes your involvement in incentive travel Response base: n = 2,464 respondents

Incentive Travel

Agencies, 35%

Suppliers to the Incentive Market, 26%

Destination Management

Companies, 20%

Incentive Travel End Users, 14%

DMOs, 5%

Sellers by category

(Share of sellers)

M8. Which of the following best describes the company for which you work? Response base (sellers): n = 414 respondents

0%

1%

1%

1%

1%

1%

2%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

73%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Convention / conference center

Non-traditional venue

Gifting

Ground transportation

AV and production

Technology company

Food and beverage

Activity, team-building

Airline

Cruise line

Other

Visitor attraction

Hotel

57

Incentive Travel Index

Demographic detail (2 of 4) Incentive agency size

(Share of incentive houses)

M4. Which of the following best describes the size of your company? Response base (incentive houses): n = 352 respondents

41%

18%

15%

7%

20%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Fewer than 25 employees

25 to 50 employees

51 to 100 employees

101 to 250 employees

More than 250 employees

Participant company size

(Share of buyers)

M3. Which of the following best describes the size of the company(ies) for which your team is primarily organizing incentive travel programs? Response base (buyers): n = 502 respondents

9%

9%

26%

15%

16%

11%

8%

5%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

Fewer than 50 employees

50 to 100 employees

101 to 500 employees

501 to 1,000 employees

1,001 to 5,000 employees

5,001 to 10,000 employees

10,001 to 50,000 employees

50,001 or more employees

58

Incentive Travel Index

Demographic detail (3 of 4) Customer industries

(Share of buyers indicating a top three rank)

M5. For which of the following industry(ies) does your team primarily organize incentive travel programs? Rank 1 is most important; label is % of all buyers choosing sector in top three Response base (buyers): n = 505 respondents

2%

3%

3%

3%

4%

4%

4%

4%

5%

6%

8%

8%

9%

18%

22%

24%

29%

38%

48%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%

Media and entertainment

Automotive parts and service

Energy, engineering, and electrical services

Luxury goods

Education

Logistics, including transportation

Retail

Other

Fast-moving consumer goods

Agriculture

Construction

Professional services

Hospitality

Direct selling to consumers

Automotive sales and distribution

Manufacturing

Pharmaceuticals and health care

Technology

Finance and insurance

Rank 1

Rank 2

Rank 3

59

Incentive Travel Index

Demographic detail (4 of 4) Experience with incentive travel

(Share of incentive house respondents or end-users)

G6. What is your experience with incentive travel? Response base (buyers): n = 616 respondents

10%

13%

16%

61%

19%

22%

31%

38%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

New to incentive travel (1-2 yrs)

Moderate experience (3-5yrs)

Substantial experience (6-10yrs)

Extended experience (10+yrs)

Incentive house End-user

60

Oxford Economics is one of the world’s foremost independent global advisory firms, providing reports, forecasts and analytical tools on 200 countries, 100

industrial sectors and over 3,000 cities. Our best-of-class global economic and industry models and analytical tools give us an unparalleled ability to forecast

external market trends and assess their economic, social and business impact.

Headquartered in Oxford, England, with regional centers in London, New York, and Singapore, Oxford Economics has offices across the globe in Belfast, Chicago,

Dubai, Miami, Milan, Paris, Philadelphia, San Francisco and Washington DC, we employ over 250 full-time staff, including 150 professional economists, industry

experts and business editors — one of the largest teams of macroeconomists and thought leadership specialists.

About Oxford Economics

Slide 1 Slide 2 Slide 3 Slide 4 Slide 5 Slide 6 Slide 7 Slide 8 Slide 9 Slide 10 Slide 11 Slide 12 Slide 13 Slide 14 Slide 15 Slide 16 Slide 17 Slide 18 Slide 19 Slide 20 Slide 21 Slide 22 Slide 23 Slide 24 Slide 25 Slide 26 Slide 27 Slide 28 Slide 29 Slide 30 Slide 31 Slide 32 Slide 33 Slide 34 Slide 35 Slide 36 Slide 37 Slide 38 Slide 39 Slide 40 Slide 41 Slide 42 Slide 43 Slide 44 Slide 45 Slide 46 Slide 47 Slide 48 Slide 49 Slide 50 Slide 51 Slide 52 Slide 53 Slide 54 Slide 55 Slide 56 Slide 57 Slide 58 Slide 59 Slide 60


Item Type: pdf